The Historic Protestant Identification of the “Man of Sin”

Papal_BeastFor an understanding of the historic Protestant interpretation of the “man of sin” referred to in 2 Thessalonians, listen to this sermon by David Silversides: Who is the Man of Sin?

Advertisements

The History of the Romeward Movement in the Church of England, 1833-1864 by Walter Walsh: Quotes From The Preface

800px-Pieter_Bruegel_the_Elder_-_The_Tower_of_Babel_(Vienna)_-_Google_Art_Project_-_editedPreface (written October 30, 1900):

“Yet these are days when the truth, however, unpleasant, needs to be told without fear or favour, and in the plainest terms.”

“But before they can succeed the Protestantism of the Church must be destroyed, and the work God did for us in the sixteenth century, through the Protestant Martyrs and Reformers, must be undone.  How they hope to accomplish this, and the tactics necessary for such a cause, are revealed in these pages.  It is an attack not merely on the Protestantism of the Church of England, but of the whole nation also, with which we have to deal.  What affects the National Church must, indirectly at least, affect Free Churchmen also.  They have cause to dread the Romeward Movement; while the Church of Rome has caused to view it with unbounded joy. It is her work that Ritualists are doing and if it is allowed to go on unhindered we may expect ere long that the forces of Rome and of the Romanisers will join hands with a view to destroying our National Protestantism by political weapons.”

“The book is issued with thankfulness to God for the wide circulation throughout the British Empire of my former work, and with an earnest prayer that He may graciously use this volume to open still more widely the eyes of the British nation to the many dangers which surround it from the labours of a gigantic army within the gates, whose dearest ambition is to bring us back to the spiritual darkness of the Dark Ages, to the rules of priestcraft, and to the intolerable bondage of the Papacy.  But, “we are not of the night, nor of the darkness. Therefore, let us not sleep, as do others; but let us watch and be sober.” (1 Thess. 5-6).”

Legal Road To American Inquisition Being Paved?

The United States Senate is currently considering a terrorism-related bill that would define the entire world as a battleground and allow for American citizens at home or abroad to be detained indefinitely without trial or charge. If this bill is passed, the possibility of relatives disappearing in the middle of the night, never to be seen or heard from again, becomes frighteningly all too real. Such actions by governments against their citizens have happened much too frequently throughout history. In the last century alone, one need only think of Communist Russia or Nazi Germany, for starters.

Here is the Infowars take on the bill:

The difference is that the danger of American citizens being detained without trial as terrorists on frivolous pretexts is an even greater danger now given that the Department of Homeland Security has characterized behavior such as buying gold, owning guns, using a watch or binoculars, donating to charity, using the telephone or email to find information, using cash, and all manner of mundane behaviors as potential indicators of domestic terrorism.

Read more: http://www.infowars.com/yes-americans-will-be-targeted-as-terrorists-under-the-ndaa/

Well, I use a watch and donate to charity so I would not be safe under this bill. Nor would anyone I know.

Here is further commentary on the bill from Alex Jones (Note: I do not consider Infowars/Alex Jones to be an entirely accurate source of information; however, there is still valuable information that can be gleaned from these videos):


This last video contains Alex Jones’ rant against what he deems the “military takeover of America:”

So what does this have to do with the Inquisition? The idea of grabbing people off the streets or out of their beds didn’t start with Communist Russia or Nazi Germany. It is a tactic that has been used many times before, particularly in Europe during the Spanish Inquisition. Under the Inquisition, people were arrested, held, and even tried and executed without being told of the charges against them. For more information about the Inquisition and the bill currently before the United States Senate, listen to these radio broadcasts from Noise of Thunder Radio:

Pray for the people of America and the world as totalitarianism continues its global rise to power.

The History of the Romeward Movement in the Church of England, 1833-1864 by Walter Walsh

800px-Pieter_Bruegel_the_Elder_-_The_Tower_of_Babel_(Vienna)_-_Google_Art_Project_-_editedI recently came across this history of the Oxford Movement in England.  I will be posting interesting quotes from the book as I read it, and anyone can find the text free here:  http://www.archive.org/stream/thehistoryofther00walsuoft/thehistoryofther00walsuoft_djvu.txt

Here is an Amazon review of the book to whet the appetite of anyone wondering what it is about:

An Amazon Review of This Book:

Excellent Book, January 14, 2009  By D. Philip Veitch “Bibliophile” (Jacksonville, North Carolina USA)

Walter Walsh, an Evangelical Anglican, exposed the strategic and tactical war plans against Protestant Anglicans crafted–carefully and secretly–by the 19th century Tractarian, Oxfordian, and Ritualistic Romanisers (TORR hereafter). The toxicity of battle is exposed in The History of the Romeward Movement in the Church of England, 1833-1864. The book is also freely downloadable at www dot books dot google dot com with an author-book search.

TORR had governing, global, national, doctrinal, liturgical, and anti-Reformation objectives. Subordinate the English Church to Rome, seize assets, livings, institutional structures, and obliterate the Protestant face of worldwide Anglicanism. John Henry Newman, the Commander-in-Chief against Protestant Anglicanism, penned the now-infamous Tract XC as an early broadside.

In Tract XC–as Walsh shows ably–Newman sought to obliterate the Protestantantism of the XXXIX Articles with this goal: “… ascertain the ultimate points of contrariety between the Roman and Anglican Creeds, and to make them as few as possible.” His opinion of Article XXII’s adverse language (purgatory, pardons, worshipping and adoration of images and relics) referred only to corrupt Roman practices. Romish doctrine did not mean Tridentine doctrine. Pardons were only “reckless indulgences from the penalties of sin obtained on money payments.” Other hot zones emerged: prayers for the dead, supremacy of the Rome, auricular confession, reservation in communicating religious knowledge, pardons, processions, altar crosses, crucifixes, processional crosses, raised stone, mixing water with the wine, elevation of the elements, bowing to the elements, crossings, genuflections, Requiem Masses for the dead, sacerdotal vestments, ornaments, and the establishment of convents. As Walsh demonstrates, this was contrary to the established practices of Reformed England of over three hundred years.

Tract XC also had another ancillary objective. Newman, at that time, was seeking to stanch secessions to Rome. Rev. Lockhart noted, “On us young men Tract XC had the effect of strengthening greatly our growing convictions that Rome was right and the Church of England wrong.”

If De-Protestantization as a mission objective failed, some were to fight from behind the lines. Writing to De Lisle, Newman noted: “I perfectly agree with you in thinking that the Movement of 1833 is not over in the country…also, I think it is for the interest of Catholicism that individuals should not join us, but should remain to leaven the mass.”

Derision, belittlement, and contempt were attitude were frequently used and demonstrated. Walter Walsh offers many examples of the anti-Protestant bigotry. Keble: “Anything which separates the present Church from the Reformers I should hail as a good idea.” Rev. William Palmer expressed vitriol. “I utterly reject and anathematise the principle of Protestantism as a heresy…And if the Church of England should ever unhappily profess herself to be a form of Protestantism then I would reject and anathematise the Church of England…In conclusion, I once more publicly profess myself a Catholic and a member of the Catholic Church, and say anathema to the principles of Protestantism….especially to those of the Lutherans and Calvinists, and British and American Dissenters.”

Rev. Dodsworth, a Newman sympathizer, summarized TORR victories. “I think its tendency towards Rome has been very decisive and very extensive. Look at the Church of England as it was fifty years ago, or even thirty. At that time it would have been thought Popish to speak of the Real Presence; the doctrine of the Eucharistic Sacrifice was scarcely known in the teaching of the Church. Auricular Confession, counsels of perfection, the Conventual life…we all identified with Popery. But now these doctrines and usages are quite current amongst Anglicans…just it not also be admitted that the revival of these things amongst Anglicans is so far a witness in favour of Rome?” Dodsworth would later swim the Eenglish Channel and Tiber River.

However, Protestant Churchmen rallied to the battle line. Protestant divines were in an uproar as Walter Walsh shows. Four learned adversaries opposed the TORR-agenda (March 8, 1841). The Oxford tutors were: T.T. Churton, Vice-Principal of Brasenose College, H.B. Wilson, Fellow and Senior Tutor of St. John’s College, John Griffiths, Tutor of Wadham College, and A.C. Tait, Fellow and Tutor of Balliol College (Tait, a Broad Churchman, would later fleet up to become the Archbishop of Canterbury). “Dangerous” was one of several terms for Newman’s writings.

Stiff resistance and pro-Protestantcame efforts came from a meeting (March 15, 1841) between Oxford’s Vice-Chancellor, the Heads of Houses, and Proctors. The leadership reaffirmed that that every Oxford student shall be instructed in and subscribe to the Thirty-nine Articles. Further, “the modes of interpretation as are suggested in the said Tract, evading rather than explaining the sense of the Thirty-Nine Articles, and reconciling subscription to them with the adoption of errors which they were designed to counteract, defeat the object, and are inconsistent with the due observance of the above-mentioned Statutes. P. Wynter, Vice-Chancellor.”

Evangelicals had target-acquisition as the Ritualistic paper, Church Review (Jun. 21, 1865) observed, “The Protestant is quite right in recognising the simplest attempt at Ritual as the `thin edge of the wedge.’ It is so….It is only the child who is not terrified when the first creeping driblet of water, and the few light bubbles announce the advance of the tide; and the Protestant is but a child who does not recognise the danger of the trifling symptoms which are so slowly and surely contracting the space of ground upon which he stands.”

Rev. William Simcox Bricknell marshaled a literary salvo with The Judgment of the Bishops upon Tractarian Theology (1845). The terms used for the Tractarians, or TORRs, were unflattering and unsupportive. Bp. Musgrave (Hereford) spoke of sophistry, evasion, and Jesuitical dishonesty. Bp. Monk (Gloucester and Bristol) invoked terms such as astonishment, concern, ingenuity, sophistry and vanity. Bp. Phillpott (Exeter) summoned terms such offensiveness, indecency, absurdity, incongruity, unjustness, sophistry, and variations from the facts of the Reformation and English Reformers. Bp. Blomfeld (London) referred to Tridentine colouring to the XXXIX Articles and the duty of the Episcopal bench to `banish and drive away all erroneous and strange doctrines.”

William Goode, one of the ablest champions against Tractarians in favour of the English Reformed Church, wrote The Divine Rule of Faith and Practice. (This book is also available at books dot google dot search dot com. With respect to Rev. Goode, the Lord Chancellor Selborne summed it up. “When William Goode, afterwards Dean of Ripon, in his Divine Rule of Faith and Practice, called the Fathers themselves as witnesses in favour of the direct use of Scripture for the decision of controversies, some of those who placed confidence in the Oxford Divines, but were themselves ignorant of the Fathers, waited anxiously for answers which never came.”

An overwhelming broadside against the Tractarians appeared with the publication of the 55-volume Parker Society Series (1840-1855), a series from the pens of the English Reformers. Supported widely and decisisvely by Bishops throughout England including the Archbishops of Canterbury and York, these works are still the finest responses to Anglo-Catholicism sought by John Henry Newman, John Keble, E.B. Pusey, R.W. Ward, Mark Pattison, William Gladstone, Lord Halifax and others.

Walter Walsh’s work is a decisive contribution to the literature on Anglicanism, Protestantism, Anglo-Catholicism, and the other tags noted by this review. This book is a must for the scholar of 19th century, Victorian, English and Anglican history.

Who is the Antichrist? from Defending Contending

Papal_Beast

This is but a ‘drop in the bucket’ as to what information is out there that confirms the prophetic scriptures, that the ‘little horn’, the ‘beast’, the ‘man of sin’, the ‘son of perdition’ and the ‘Antichrist’ are none other than the Pope of Rome (a successive reign) throughout history.

Read the entire article: http://defendingcontending.com/2011/11/29/who-is-the-anti-christ/

Reviews of Rome Sweet Rome – Our Journey to Catholicism by Scott and Kimberly Hahn…

…can be found at The Berean Library here: http://thebereanlibrary.com/archives/3394

Herescope: The Vatican and the New World Order

800px-Pieter_Bruegel_the_Elder_-_The_Tower_of_Babel_(Vienna)_-_Google_Art_Project_-_edited

The Vatican document concludes with the following lesson: Referring to Genesis 11, they spin the tower of Babel to mean that diversity (as opposed to unity) is as a result of selfishness and leads to division. It further states that Babel is a warning of what happens when we don’t stick together and when nations choose to separate. The document very clearly calls for mankind to reverse the effects of Babel and to return to the process of building a unifying (and God-defying) structure. To sum up, they are literally calling for the rebuilding of Babylon, not of physical Babylon in modern day Iraq, but a political, financial, and spiritual Babylon pictured and prophesied of in Revelation 17 and 18!

Read more: http://herescope.blogspot.com/2011/11/vatican-and-new-world-order.html

Revelation 16:13-16:  And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty. Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame. And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon.

Revelation 17:12-14:  And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.  These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.  These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful.

“Pope to promote peace in talks with world religious leaders”

800px-Pieter_Bruegel_the_Elder_-_The_Tower_of_Babel_(Vienna)_-_Google_Art_Project_-_edited

Over 50 Islamic representatives are expected to attend the talks from several countries, including Saudi Arabia and Iran.

They will be joined by Rabbis, Hindus, Buddhists, Jains, Sikhs, a Zoroastrian, a Bahai and representatives of Taoism and Confucianism as well as of other traditional religions from Africa and America.

Posted at Capitol FM News by on October 25, 2011.  Read more: http://www.capitalfm.co.ke/news/2011/10/pope-to-promote-peace-in-talks-with-world-religious-leaders/

Revelation 16:13-16:  And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet. For they are the spirits of devils, working miracles, which go forth unto the kings of the earth and of the whole world, to gather them to the battle of that great day of God Almighty. Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame. And he gathered them together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon.

Revelation 17:12-14:  And the ten horns which thou sawest are ten kings, which have received no kingdom as yet; but receive power as kings one hour with the beast.  These have one mind, and shall give their power and strength unto the beast.  These shall make war with the Lamb, and the Lamb shall overcome them: for he is Lord of lords, and King of kings: and they that are with him are called, and chosen, and faithful.

Revelation 13:3:  …and all the world wondered after the beast.

What is Preterism?

From L’Avenir:

II. THE ANTI-PROTESTANT PRATERITE (PRETERIST-ed.)THEORY.

This was originated by a Spanish Jesuit also, Alcasar of Seville, who, A.D. 1615, published a work having in view the same end as Ribera, viz., to set aside the Protestant application of the Apocalyptic prophecies and symbols. Ribera endeavored to throw everything forward into the future. Alcasar endeavoured to throw every thing backward into the past. He stops short in the course of history, and makes all the Apocalyptic symbols to have been fulfilled within the first five six centuries. The Germanic Neronic Form; so called because it dates the Apocalypse (an essential point for interpreters) about the end of Nero’s reign, A.D. 67 and because it is thus regarded by the critical, rationalistic school of German expositors, and by Professor Stuart in America. According to this view, the Apocalypse can only refer to the overthrow of Judaism and Heathenism, and the triumph of Christianity, but not to the Papacy. The early date, viz., A.D. 67, makes room for supposing a reference to the destruction of Jerusalem, A.D. 70; and the six centuries, for the overthrow of heathenism, and the prevalence of Christianity, but not for the demolition of the Roman Catholic Church! The Papal Domitianic Form; so called because it fixes the date of the Apocalypse about the end of Domitian’s reign, A.D. 96; and in this form prevails with the Papacy. Of course, this form of the theory excludes application of the symbols of the Apocalypse to the destruction of Jerusalem, which occurred twenty-five years previous to this date, inasmuch as the events recorded were to come into being after the time John wrote.-(Rev. 4:1). The fall of Judaism and the doom of the Roman Catholic Church are not referred to at all, but only the overthrow of Heathenism and the triumph of Christianity. Such is the loose and wholesale mode of generalising in these two forms of Praeterism (the latter of which has yet some truth), that any upstart has a precedent before him for applying the Apocalyptic symbols to the destruction of any enemy he please.

Learn more at Still Waters Revival Books, www.swrb.com.

“Dead birds litter Georgian Bay in the thousands”

Dead Barbet, Ashy Bulbul hunted

As many as 6,000 dead birds have washed up on the shores of Georgian Bay in Ontario, say authorities, who believe botulism may be to blame.

Read more: http://news.ca.msn.com/top-stories/dead-birds-litter-georgian-bay-in-the-thousands-9

Exploring Eschatology From A Protestant Historicist Perspective

%d bloggers like this: