“The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining super capitalism and Communism under the same tent, all under their control…. Do I mean conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent.”
Reformation.org on the attempted Jesuit takeover of the papacy and the U.S. This fits with the interpretation of the woman on the beast in Revelation 17 as the Jesuit order trying to control the international political order:
Beginning with the new millennium, the Militia of Satan opted for a new 3-pronged strategy:
- Install a Jesuit White Pope in the Vatican.
- Install a Jesuit Chief Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court.
- Install a Jesuit President in the White House...
Shaun Willcock at Bible Based Ministries:
In September 2018, after a long period of contact between the two, came the news that the Vatican and Red China had signed an agreement which would permit the Chinese Communist government to have the final say in the appointment of Roman Catholic bishops in China.
Expressing what millions of Roman Catholics felt, the signing was described as “a shocking development to many” by a Roman Catholic source. An understatement of note.
Just what was going on?
For many decades, the Chinese Communist government has claimed the right to control all religious activity in China, and has brutally clamped down on all who dissent: Protestants, Papists and others. This approach to religion is of course in accordance with old-style Communist principles, to which China subscribes wholeheartedly. The State must be all-powerful, according to Communist ideology; and in Communist countries like China and Russia (the old USSR), not to mention many others, the only religions permitted by the State to exist are State-sanctioned, State-controlled ones. In this way the Reds give the appearance of permitting religious freedom while simultaneously controlling religions with an iron fist.
Following its anti-religious policy, China claimed the right to appoint Chinese Roman Catholic bishops, as well as Protestant ministers and all other religious leaders. The Vatican strongly opposed the State appointment of bishops for all these years. As a consequence, two “Catholic Churches” existed in China: the official, State-controlled one, known as the Chinese Catholic Patriotic Association, the priests and bishops of which were not in subjection to the Vatican and were in fact Communist agents; and an underground, illegal one, the priests and bishops of which remained loyal to the Vatican. The latter, being orthodox Roman Catholics, suffered persecution at the hands of the Chinese government for many years.
But with the signing of this agreement, all future bishops of the Chinese Roman Catholic “Church” would first be approved by the Chinese government – with the blessing and co-operation of the Vatican!
Bruce Charlton, Comment 11, offers a very insightful assessment of current world events:
The covert but implict aim of US/ UK/ EU/ UN etc. interventions in Syria (like other places) seems to be the elimination of Christianity in the Middle East.
Despite 1400 years of Islam, the religion had survived in considerable numbers as as a large minority, until the ‘Arab Spring’…
…Apparently, the Western powers have achieved in less than a decade what more than 1000 years of Islam did not.
I have heard a detailed first hand report of the Middle East situation for Christians from a trustwothy and experienced eyewitness that details all this, but see also:
The historicists I have read predicted that in our days there would be a worldwide alliance aimed at destroying true Christianity once and for all. This seems to fit. May the devil’s empire fall swiftly and soon.
April 12, 2019:
“Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov declared today that the Western, liberal model of society is dying, and a new [AC-polycentric] world order is taking its place…
“The Western liberal model of development, which particularly stipulates a partial loss of national sovereignty – this is what our Western colleagues aimed at when they invented what they called globalization – is losing its attractiveness and is no more viewed as a perfect model for all. Moreover, many people in the very western countries are skeptical about it.”
If this Vatican logo tells us anything, it is that Pope Francis is comfortable with Islam’s ascendency. The “relation” made visual here is one of domination. Take a look…
Revelation 9:21: Neither repented they of their murders, nor of their sorceries, nor of their fornication, nor of their thefts.
“A new photograph collection, ‘Major Arcana: Witches in America,’ explores the idea of who identifies as a witch today – and there are no pointy hats, warts or green skin anywhere to be seen…”
“Witches are sharing their magical teachings and talents with the masses using Instagram, and the most popular accounts have scored thousands of followers…”
Shaun Willcock of Bible Based Ministries:
Ever since the European Union arose on the world stage, decades ago now, gradually increasing in power and strength, Futurist interpreters of prophecy have seen in the EU a fulfilment of the prophecies in Daniel and Revelation which speak of the “ten kings”, symbolised by “ten toes” and “ten horns”. They have correctly understood that these refer to ten European nations; but thereafter their interpretation descends into error, for they claim that these prophecies will be fulfilled by modern European states eventually giving their support to some future, political individual, whom they identify with the Antichrist. Futurism, by definition, assigns a future fulfilment to biblical prophecies. Certainly, many Futurists would say that the future is now here, and that we are living through the early stages of the fulfilment of the prophecies; but when I say that Futurism holds to a future Antichrist, a future tribulation, a future “united states of Europe”, I mean that Futurism scoffs at the notion that many biblical prophecies were in fact fulfilled in past centuries, or that some of them started to be fulfilled centuries ago and have continued to be fulfilled to the present day.
This is the Historicist understanding of Bible prophecy, and it was once almost universally held among Protestants; but in more recent times it came to be replaced by the Futurist theory. This is a great tragedy, for in claiming that virtually all Bible prophecy has to do with a brief period of time near the end of the world, and with the Christians alive at that time and no others, Futurism essentially denies that history has fulfilled prophecy throughout the centuries of this Gospel age; and furthermore, it means that for all previous generations of Christians, through two thousand years of Church history, the prophecies of Daniel, Revelation, and elsewhere were essentially useless. After all, why read and study things which will only supposedly be fulfilled during a short space of time in the future? Truly, the Jesuit creator of this theory (yes, a Jesuit priest foisted it upon the world!) has caused untold confusion within the ranks of Protestantism!
Let us then turn our attention to what Bible prophecy says about Europe. Certainly it has much to say – but not what Futurists would like to force it to say.
The EU Far Exceeds 10
Decades ago, as the countries joining the European Union crept towards the number ten, Futurist prophecy expositors grew increasingly excited. They saw the fulfilment of these prophecies as imminent! And sure enough, the day came when there were ten member states of the EU. Great jubilation in the Futurist camp! Prophecy being fulfilled before everyone’s eyes!
But wait… the number then climbed to eleven, then twelve, then thirteen, then fourteen. What was going on? As it steadily rose higher – and then still higher – various explanations were given, none of them satisfactory. And where does the number stand now? At 28! The EU is today much, much larger than the ten it was supposed to stay at, according to the theory.
But for those who were able to get past this irritating little fact and still see the EU as the sole fulfilment of the prophecies relating to the “ten kings”, they had other things to concern them. For example: what happens if the EU one day disintegrates? When the United Kingdom voted to exit the EU in 2016, this possibility became a very real one, and was openly expressed and discussed by the powers that be around the world.
The Killing of Uncle Sam, page 143:
A SUBVERSIVE PURPOSE
In 1957, a congressional investigative committee revealed the following finding: “In the international field, foundations, and an interlock among some of them and certain intermediary organizations, have exercised a strong effect upon our foreign policy and upon public education in things international. This has been accomplished by vast propaganda, by supplying executives and advisers to government and by controlling much research in this area through the power of the purse. The net result of these combined efforts has been to promote ‘internationalism’ in a particular sense—a form directed toward ‘world government’ and a derogation of American ‘nationalism.’ The CFR has become in essence an agency of the United States Government [and its] productions are not objective but are directed overwhelmingly at promoting the globalist concept.”
This subversive purpose has been verified by Foreign Affairs, the Council’s own publication, which has been called “the most influential periodical in print” by Time magazine. In its inaugural issue (September 1922), the journal condemned “the dubious doctrines expressed by such phrases of ‘safety first’ and ‘America first.’” In its second issue, Philip Kerr, a member of the British Round Table, declared: “Obviously there is going to be no peace or prosperity for mankind so long as it remains divided into fifty or sixty independent states. Equally obviously there is going to be no steady progress in civilization or self-government among the more backward peoples until some kind of international system is created which will put an end to the diplomatic struggles of every nation to make itself secure. The real problem today is that of world government.”
The globalists have it backwards. There can only be world peace where different groups of people have the right to their own self-determination in their own homelands, without interference by outside forces. Parts of Europe seem to be awakening to this. Time will tell if North America does, too.
James P. Warburg, of Greenwich, Conn:
The past 15 years of my life have been devoted almost exclusively to studying the problem of world peace and, especially, the relation of the United States to these problems. These studies led me, 10 years ago, to the conclusion that the great question of our time is not whether or not one world can be achieved, but whether or not one world can be achieved by peaceful means.
We shall have world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.